PLAINSBORO, N.J. and BAGSVÆRD, Denmark, April 2, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Novo Nordisk will present the ORION study at the upcoming Obesity Medicine Association's annual conference in San Diego showing that Wegovy® (semaglutide) tablets 25 mg was associated with significantly greater mean weight loss than orforglipron 36 mg in a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison1. It is important to note that the FDA recently approved orforglipron under the brand name Foundayo™ at doses ranging up to 17.2 mg.3 The approved 17.2 mg tablet is the equivalent to the orforglipron 36 mg capsules used in phase 3 trials, and which served as the study comparator in ORION.1,4 Additionally, in a separate patient preference study, adults with overweight or obesity showed greater preference for an oral semaglutide-like profile than an orforglipron-like profile.2 These findings suggest potential differentiation and provide valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making.1
"These studies add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical strength of semaglutide and highlight attributes that patients value when choosing an obesity medicine that fits their lifestyle," said Jamey Millar, executive vice president, US Operations of Novo Nordisk. "Since its approval, we've seen strong interest in Wegovy® pill, from both healthcare professionals and people seeking obesity therapy, underscoring the importance of our continued focus on advancing obesity care through our relentless pursuit of innovation."
The ORION study was a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) evaluating weight loss efficacy and tolerability between oral semaglutide 25 mg and orforglipron 36 mg using data from the OASIS 4 and ATTAIN-1 phase 3 clinical trials. A simulated treatment comparison was used to assess percentage change from baseline in body weight. A two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison was used for tolerability outcomes (treatment discontinuation due to any adverse event and due to gastrointestinal adverse events).1 Analyses were adjusted for baseline body weight, glycemic status, and sex.1
ORION results showed that oral semaglutide 25 mg demonstrated significantly greater weight loss compared with orforglipron 36 mg, with mean differences [95% CI] of -3.2 percentage points [-5.9, -0.4]* regardless of whether patients stayed on treatment and -3.0 percentage points [-5.8, -0.3]** if all patients stayed on treatment.1 In addition, this analysis showed that when compared with oral semaglutide 25 mg, orforglipron 36 mg was associated with ~4 times higher odds of treatment discontinuation due to any adverse event (AEs) (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 4.1 [1.3, 13.0]) and ~14 times higher odds of treatment discontinuation due to AEs related to gastrointestinal (GI) issues (OR [95% CI]: 13.9 [2.0, 96.0]).1
Although researchers adjusted for key baseline characteristics, other unaccounted factors may remain. Additionally, between-trial protocol differences may also influence comparability. While a significant difference was observed for tolerability, the magnitude of these differences should be interpreted with caution due to low adverse event counts.1
"People often ask how one medication compares to another when making obesity treatment management decisions," said Robert F. Kushner, MD, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine. "Since there are no head-to-head trials comparing oral semaglutide for obesity to orforglipron, this indirect treatment comparison from the ORION study provides important information that can be used during the shared decision-making process."
Additionally, OPTIC was an online patient preference study assessing key factors driving obesity treatment decisions conducted from October to November 2025. The study was conducted among 800 adults with either obesity or overweight and at least one obesity-related complication, with or without prior experience using obesity medicine, and included a predicted choice comparison of hypothetical treatment profiles similar to oral semaglutide 25 mg and orforglipron.2 Results of the predicted choice comparison based on clinical trial results showed that 84% of survey respondents favored the oral semaglutide-like profile option.2 Additionally, a majority of all respondents (65%) agreed that taking a treatment on an empty stomach and waiting 30 minutes before eating (oral semaglutide-like dosing instructions) would not disrupt their daily lives.2
Key limitations include the study's observational nature, selection bias, and use of hypothetical profiles.2 Because this survey was conducted prior to regulatory approval, treatment profiles may not exactly match the FDA-approved labeling for products.
It is important to note that semaglutide tablets 25 mg contains a Boxed Warning for possible thyroid tumors, including cancer and should not be used in those with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2). The most common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, stomach (abdomen) pain, changes in skin sensations, headache, tiredness (fatigue), upset stomach, dizziness, feeling bloated, belching, low blood sugar in people with type 2 diabetes, gas, stomach flu, heartburn, and hair loss.5
*Based on the treatment regimen estimand: treatment effect regardless of whether patients stayed on treatment or took other weight loss therapies.
**Based on the efficacy estimand: estimated efficacy in an idealized scenario in which all patients stayed on treatment and took no other weight loss therapies.
About ORION
The ORION study was a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) that evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral semaglutide 25 mg (OASIS 4 trial data) versus orforglipron 36 mg (ATTAIN-1 trial data) in adults with obesity (BMI>=30 kg/m2), or overweight (BMI >=27 kg/m2) and at least one weight-related comorbidity without diabetes. A simulated treatment comparison (STC) was used to compare percentage change from baseline in body weight, while a two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison (2SMAIC) was used to assess tolerability outcomes, including treatment discontinuations due to any adverse event (AEs) and gastrointestinal AEs. The analyses were adjusted for differences between trial populations, including sex, glycemic status (blood sugar levels), and baseline body weight however, residual differences may remain.1
About OPTIC
OPTIC was a noninterventional, cross-sectional online survey study of 800 US adults with obesity or overweight and at least one obesity-related complication conducted between October-November 2025. Out of 800 survey respondents, half (n=400) had never used an obesity medicine and half (n=400) had used an obesity medicine. The survey included a discrete choice experiment which presented respondents with a series of questions to choose between two hypothetical oral obesity medicine profiles with 7 attributes such as efficacy, CV risk reduction, administration, and dosing instructions. Using a statistical model, researchers calculated preference weights, which were used to predict the probability an average respondent would choose a given treatment profile. Additionally, a predicted-choice comparison asked respondents to choose between an oral semaglutide-like and orforglipron-like treatment profile.2
About obesity
Obesity is a serious, chronic, progressive, and complex disease that requires long-term management.6-8 One key misunderstanding is that this is a disease of just lack of willpower, when in fact there is underlying biology that may impede people with obesity from losing weight and keeping it off.6,8 Obesity is influenced by a variety of factors, including genetics, social determinants of health, and the environment.9,10
About Novo Nordisk
Novo Nordisk is a leading global healthcare company with a heritage of more than 100 years in diabetes care. Building on this foundation, our purpose is to drive change to defeat serious chronic diseases — from diabetes and obesity to rare blood and endocrine disorders — by pioneering scientific breakthroughs, expanding access to medicines, and working to prevent and ultimately cure disease. We are committed to long-term, responsible business practices that deliver financial, social and environmental value. Headquartered in Denmark and operating in around 80 countries, Novo Nordisk employs approximately 68,800 people and markets products in roughly 170 countries. In the United States, Novo Nordisk has a 40-year presence, is headquartered in New Jersey and employs approximately 10,000 people across more than 10 manufacturing, R&D, and corporate locations in seven states plus Washington, D.C. For more information, visit novonordisk-us.com, Facebook, Instagram, and X.
Contacts for further information | ||
Media: | ||
Liz Skrbkova (US) | Ambre James-Brown (Global) | |
Investors: | ||
Frederik Taylor Pitter (US) +1 609 613 0568 | ||
Michael Novod (Global) +45 3075 6050 | Jacob Martin Wiborg Rode (Global) +45 3075 5956 | |
Sina Meyer (Global) +45 3079 6656 | Max Ung (Global) +45 3077 6414 | |
Christoffer Sho Togo Tullin (Global) +45 3079 1471 | Alex Bruce (Global) +45 3444 2613 | |
References:
© 2026 Novo Nordisk All rights reserved. US26SEMO00591 April 2026

Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/466582/5898297/Novo_Nordisk_Logo.jpg
Der Krieg im Nahen Osten zwingt Ökonomen, ihre Erwartungen für die globale Konjunktur spürbar nach unten zu revidieren. Nach neuen Berechnungen der ACREDIA Group in Zusammenarbeit mit Allianz Research dürfte das weltweite Wachstum 2026 nur noch bei 2,6 Prozent liegen – ein Rückgang um 0,5 Prozentpunkte gegenüber den Prognosen vor der jüngsten Eskalation. Der Konflikt verstärkt damit bestehende strukturelle Schwächen wie hohe Staatsdefizite und anfällige Lieferketten und erhöht zugleich die Unsicherheit an den Märkten.
Die Abschwächung zeigt sich quer über die großen Wirtschaftsblöcke. Für die USA rechnen die Analysten 2026 mit einem Plus von 2,1 Prozent. In der Eurozone soll die Wirtschaftsleistung nur noch um 0,8 Prozent zulegen. Parallel dazu steigt der Preisdruck: Die Inflation dürfte sich in den USA bei etwa 3,2 Prozent einpendeln, in der Eurozone bei rund 3,0 Prozent. Damit wird der Zielkorridor vieler Notenbanken weiter verfehlt, während Unternehmen und Haushalte mit erhöhten Kosten konfrontiert bleiben.
Im Zentrum der Risiken steht der Energiemarkt. Die Straße von Hormus, über die rund 25 Prozent der weltweiten Öl- und Gasströme verlaufen, bleibt ein neuralgischer Punkt für den globalen Handel. Im Basisszenario gehen ACREDIA und Allianz Research davon aus, dass sich der Ölpreis bis Ende 2026 bei etwa 80 US‑Dollar je Barrel stabilisiert. Eine weitere militärische Eskalation mit längerfristigen Unterbrechungen der Transportwege könnte jedoch laut Studie zu massiven Verwerfungen führen und Ölpreise von bis zu 180 US‑Dollar pro Barrel nach sich ziehen – mit entsprechend deutlichem Aufwärtsdruck auch auf die Gaspreise.
Besonders exponiert sind energieabhängige Regionen und exportorientierte Volkswirtschaften. Für Länder wie Österreich, deren Geschäftsmodell stark auf offenen Märkten, stabilen Lieferketten und berechenbaren Handelsströmen beruht, droht ein doppelter Druck: Ein klassischer Kostenschock durch steigende Energie-, Rohstoff- und Vorproduktpreise trifft auf bereits angespannte Margen in vielen Unternehmen. ACREDIA-Vorstand Michael Kolb warnt, die geopolitische Eskalation treffe auf eine ohnehin fragile Weltwirtschaft und verschärfe die bestehenden Ungleichgewichte – mit Folgen, die über 2026 und 2027 hinausreichen könnten.